‘You reported the wrong thing’: Trump threatens to sue unrepentant Pulitzer executive for defamation over awards given to ‘Russia hoax’ journalists

Former President Donald Trump said Saturday he would sue the Pulitzer Prize panel for awarding journalists who promoted the discredited “Russia hoax” narrative and duplicating allegedly defamatory statements. For over a year, Trump has insisted that the Pulitzer Board is withdrawing awards from the New York Times and Washington Post because award-winning reporting has “become worthless and meaningless.”

what are the details

At his Save America rally Saturday in Robstown, Texas, Trump divided his attention between the future and the recent past.

As for the future, Trump hinted that he would “probably” run for president again in 2024, stating, “To make our country prosperous, safe and glorious again, I’ll probably have to do it all over again.” the need to focus first on the midterm elections and secure a “historic victory for the Republican Party this November.”

Referring to the recent past, Trump stressed that those who covered the so-called Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election should not be allowed to keep their awards for national coverage.

Instead of targeting individual journalists, Trump has escalated his criticism of the Pulitzer Prize panel, which recently refused to revoke awards given to reporters for spreading the “Russia hoax.”

The awards in question went to staff at the New York Times and Washington Post to the What the Pulitzer Prize Board described as “well-sourced, relentlessly reported public interest reporting that dramatically underscores the nation’s understanding of Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election and its connections to the Trump campaign, the president-elect’s transition team and his eventual administration.” promoted.”

The former President said: “You gave the Pulitzer Prize for reporting on the Russia hoax, reporting on Russia, Russia, Russia. So you’ve got reporters from the Washington Post, the New York Times, who have won Pulitzer Prizes, and they’ve been reporting on exactly the wrong thing.”

While the liberal media has been tipped for “misreporting,” spreading and amplifying false claims that Trump and his team had colluded with Russia, the former president noted that “other people should have gotten the Pulitzer because they honestly did.” got it right years.”

Trump claimed that “they don’t give Pulitzer Prizes” to those who he thinks got it right, like Fox News anchors Sean Hannity, Tucker Carlson, Jeanine Pirro and Laura Ingraham.

Trump indicated that rather than requesting another rectification within the next two weeks, he would “sue the Pulitzer Organization to have these awards withdrawn.”

“By allowing these people to misunderstand Russia, Russia, Russia [to get the award]’ Trump said, ‘they are actually smearing me for saying they got it right and it turned out to be a hoax.’


The Pulitzer Prize Board’s refusal to overturn

After receiving the Pulitzer in 2018, the New York Times reported celebrated himself for “changing the nation’s understanding of Russian interference in the 2016 election”.

The Washington Post ran similarly an article At the time, he boasted that “The Post’s revelations about Russia, including contacts between Russian figures and President Trump’s staff and advisers, helped set the stage for the Special Counsel’s ongoing investigation into the administration.”

This investigation by the Ministry of Justice said cost $32 million and ended with Special Counsel Robert Mueller find no evidence of the Russian agreements.

Even after the Steel dossier was discredited (admitted to the pages of the New York Times), the NYT and the Washington Post both doubled, suggesting the Russian probe was still undercut as early as spring 2022.

city ​​hall written down in 2019 that “none of the newspapers’ reporting was ‘heavily sourced,’ although it was ‘relentlessly reported,’ probably because they were trying to advance their editorial agenda … Now that we know there was no collusion, now, where we know there was no disability, does that mean we get a repeat at that award?”

Trump has been asking the same question for years.

legal action

The hill reported that Trump wrote to Pulitzer’s interim administrator last October, claiming that the national reporting accolade bestowed on the two liberal newspapers “was based on misreporting of a non-existent connection between the Kremlin and the Trump campaign.”

Faced with similar calls from Trump and others, the Pulitzer Board announced on July 18 that it had commissioned two independent reviews of the award-winning work.

Corresponding a statement from the board of directorsthe “separate reviews came together in their conclusions: that no passage or headline, claim or assertion in any of the winning entries was discredited by facts that became known after the awards were presented.”

On October 13, Trump’s attorneys Jeremy Bailie and R. Quincy Bird wrote to Marjorie Miller, Administrator of the Pulitzer Prize Panel, regarding the panel’s July statement. In the letter, Trump’s attorneys informed the board that “a defamatory statement regarding President Trump has been and remains posted on the board’s website since July 18, 2022.”

The letter warned that “the board, including its individual members, could be sued for defamation and face a compensatory judgment, including punitive damages,” and called not only for the statement to be removed by October 18, but also for the “one full and fair correction, apology or revocation issued.”

In addition, Trump’s attorneys noted that “the revoking of the 2018 Pulitzer Prizes in National Reporting from their current recipients would necessarily be part of any full and fair attempt to right the wrongs caused by the board’s conduct.”

The letter advanced Trump’s claim on Saturday that “The New York Times and Washington Post have been and continue to be two of the most important propagators of the Russia Collusion Hoax” and that it was “obvious that the 2018 Pulitzer Pries intended to support the full, misleading work of two mainstream media organizations on the Russia collusion hoax.”

A hostile Pulitzer board

The Pulitzer Prize Board, 2017-2018, which presented the awards for investigations into disproved Russian interference included a number of harsh Trump critics, such as New York Times opinion columnist Gail Collins.

Two years before deciding whether reporting on so-called Russian interference surrounding Trump’s election and presidency deserves an award, Collins refers to the President as“A dimwitted, mean breed that embodies the nation’s worst mistakes, mistakes and nightmares” and proposed before the 2016 election that undecided people should vote for Clinton.

Eugene Robinson, chairman of the 2018 Pulitzer Prize Board, is a columnist and associate editor of the Washington Post, which also happened to be the recipient of the award. He is also an outspoken critic of the former president.

The year he was on the board, Robinson accused Trump of “speaking the language of white supremacy.” tell his Twitter followers: “Get angry and then get revenge: Vote against his enablers in November.”

So did the chairman of the Pulitzer Prize panel accused Trump to be a “Putin fanboy”.

https://www.theblaze.com/news/they-reported-the-exact-wrong-thing-trump-threatens-to-sue-pulitzer-board-for-awarding-journalists-for-discredited-reports-on-russia-hoax ‘You reported the wrong thing’: Trump threatens to sue unrepentant Pulitzer executive for defamation over awards given to ‘Russia hoax’ journalists

Laura Coffey

World Time Todays is an automatic aggregator of the all world’s media. In each content, the hyperlink to the primary source is specified. All trademarks belong to their rightful owners, all materials to their authors. If you are the owner of the content and do not want us to publish your materials, please contact us by email – admin@worldtimetodays.com. The content will be deleted within 24 hours.

Related Articles

Back to top button